The old white sportswriters said the flicking, shying kid with the senseless doggerel would get thumped into the ringside seats with one punch. It was 1964, and Cassius Clay hadn't yet butterflied into the mythic champion Muhammad Ali. He was all the while hatching in a sweltering Miami Beach rec center, where the maturing supposition producers in their restricted bowties watched him work out, disapprovingly, as he rapped out verses on the substantial pack with his light gloves, whap-whap-whap-wump. The gossip was that he was sticking around with Malcolm and the Muslims. Be that as it may, surprisingly more terrible was the way he battled. The child kept running from a punch.
He was all the while developing, only an early 22-year-old "whose face swung to cameras as blooms answer to the sun," as his biographer Dave Kindred would compose. For only 25 pennies, anybody could go watch him work at the fifth Street Gym, an airless, low-ceilinged hotbox up a wood staircase in a slummy piece of Miami Beach. Some way or another with only 19 genius triumphs he had fast lipped his way into a world-heavyweight http://www.mapleprimes.com/users/arfandroid session with Sonny Liston, the criminals' buddy with the truncheon clench hands, against whom he was a 8-1 underdog. "He was film industry penance," recalls Robert Lipsyte, then a 26-year-old sportswriter sent to cover him by the New York Times, on the grounds that the fundamental boxing essayist thought of him as excessively inconsequential, making it impossible to trouble with.
Those months of '64 were possibly the most fascinating in his independent epic of an existence. A month prior to the battle, taking after a workout, Clay got a pen and signed and dated a couple of his gloves: "From Cassius Clay, Next Heavyweight Champion of the World." Then he underlined it, intensely. You can see the gloves at the Smithsonian. "He took a gander at himself as an authentic figure, even at that age," Suzanne Dundee Bonner, the niece of his coach Angelo Dundee, let me know for Smithsonian Magazine two or three years back, when the gloves went to the historical center for a show on self-change.
Just about no one put stock in the challenger, or comprehended who he was. No one. The promoters experienced such difficulty offering tickets to the battle that they forewarned Clay to keep his Muslim change calm. Talk got around in any case that Malcolm X was coming to Miami and there was somebody in his camp from the Nation of Islam, which just made the more seasoned white sportswriters more suspicious. Red Smith didn't care for those "unwashed punks" of the counterculture. Joe Louis was the right sort of stately dark champion; he kept his mouth close and called feature writer Jimmy Cannon "Sir."
"Dirt didn't demonstrate any admiration," Lipsyte says. "He was exceptionally blustery and treated everyone verging on easygoing, off-gave. They sort of lost control of the account."
In any case, abnormally, what they doubted much more than his otherworldly abandonment was his boxing style. As A.J. Liebling put it, he had "a skittering style, similar to a rock scaled over water." His boxing procedure appeared to whole up each extremist, subversive thing about him: Instead of slipping punches, Clay reclined. He was a runner.
"He was totally unconventional. No one had ever seen a contender like that," Kindred says. "In the event that you moved in an opposite direction from some person, you were seen to dodge the battle. Nobody ever did that. You went ahead. They simply didn't care for the way he battled."
Of the 46 sportswriters credentialed to cover the battle, 43 anticipated a Liston triumph — the greater part of them by knockout, huge numbers of them in the first round. All things considered, Liston had twice decked Floyd Patterson to the floor, so what might he do to this ducking adolescent? Smith called him "the kid big talker." Cannon called him "all affectation and gas, no genuineness." Arthur Daley of the New York Times anticipated, "The windbag from Louisville is liable to have a great deal of vainglorious gloats stuck down his throat by a ham-like fist. . ." Liston got in on it, as well. Approached what he searched for from Clay in the first round, he said, "I search for him to pull a firearm."
At his last question and answer session before the battle, Clay told the journalists, "It's your keep going opportunity to get on the temporary fad. I'm keeping a rundown of all you individuals. After the battle is done, we're going to have a move call up there in the ring. . . . I'm going to have a service and a great deal of eating is going on – eating of words."
In any case, at the say something regarding the morning of the battle, they said Clay looked terrified. He must be kept down by his camp as he hollered at the venemous Liston, "Chump! Chump!" When the battle specialist checked his pulse and heart rate and reported it had raised to 120, the authors took it as proof that he was alarmed. There were bits of gossip that he fled to the air terminal.
Be that as it may, then they were in the ring and the ringer rang — and the upset was on and the activist mystic rhyming-sage-alluring was conceived, with his hands flying and tassled feet moving. Gun was changed over before the end of the first round in the wake of watching Clay diminish Liston to "a matured chophouse server with terrible feet conveying an overwhelming plate." By cycle three, there were cuts all over. By cycle seven, the previous champion sat on his stool declining to turn out with a shoulder harm to attempt to locate the subtle Clay, and the new champion was shouting at the authors, "Try to go back on what was said!" Red Smith started to compose, with "a mouth still dry from fervor," conceding in print that "the words don't taste great." Lipsyte, as well, started writing. Unfathomably, he composed, Clay hadn't been boasting, or huckstering; he had been "coming clean from the beginning."
The following morning at his public interview, Clay said, "I'm through talking. I should simply be a pleasant, clean man of his word." And then he openly recognized that he went to Black Muslim gatherings.
"I don't need to be what you need me to be," he declared. "I'm liberated to be who I need."
In the United States, link news systems ran one end to the other with Ali news and responses throughout the day Saturday. There were no lack of big names and writers willing to go on air. Individuals ran to YouTube, where some of his great battles live on. On online networking, millions who never met him depicted how he had by the by touched their lives.
It was every one of the a response Ali seemed to have anticipated. In his 2004 diary, "The Soul of a Butterfly: Reflections on Life's Journey" — a joint effort with his little girl Hana Yasmeen Ali, he tended to the topic of how he might want to be composed:
"I might want to be recognized as a man who won the heavyweight title three times, who was clever, and who treated everybody right. As a man who never looked down on the individuals who admired him, and who helped the greatest number of individuals as he could. As a man who supported his convictions regardless. As a man who attempted to join all mankind through confidence and adoration. Furthermore, on the off chance that all that is excessively, then I figure I'd settle for being recollected just as an awesome boxer who turned into a pioneer and champion for his kin. Also, I' wouldn't fret if people overlooked how lovely I was."
Colby Coash can indicate the minute his advancement in pondering capital punishment started.
It was Sept. 3, 1994, and Coash — now a preservationist representative in the Nebraska lawmaking body however then a first year recruit at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln — chose to run with a few companions to the state prison. Willie Otey, indicted first-degree homicide, was set to be executed at midnight, and individuals were social affair in the parking area outside. Coash can in any case recall the scene: the live band, the flame broiling meat, the revelers popping jars of lager and droning, "Sear him!"
"You wouldn't have possessed the capacity to differentiate between the parking area of the prison and a rear end. It was truly terrible," Coash says now. Despite the fact that he went to the occasion as a supporter of the death penalty, he says, "it sort of changed my heart. I thought, 'I would prefer not to be a piece of state-supported killing.' "
For a great part of the previous 40 years, open backing for capital punishment has been high, beating out at 80 percent in 1994, as indicated by Gallup surveying. In the late 1980s and mid 1990s, capital punishment was popular to the point that it was utilized as a political club by Republicans hoping to delineate adversaries as delicate on wrongdoing. In the 1988 presidential race, Democrat Michael Dukakis was pounded by George H.W.http://www.studiopress.com/forums/users/arfandroid/ Hedge's battle and the media after he said at a verbal confrontation that he would not bolster capital punishment, regardless of the possibility that somebody assaulted and killed his significant other. In 1992, hopeful Bill Clinton, then legislative head of Arkansas and hoping to keep away from a rehash of Dukakis' inconvenience, came back to his home state to manage the execution of a rationally handicapped detainee named Ricky Ray Rector. Since the Supreme Court legitimized the death penalty in 1976, "most people of every political introduction were for capital punishment when posed the question in theory," says Robert Dunham, official chief of the Death Penalty Information Center.
In any case, that has begun to move. Presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump both backing capital punishment — however Trump is a great deal more eager, and Clinton has needed to respond in due order regarding her better half's criminal equity approaches amid her essential battle against Sen. Bernie Sanders. A Pew survey found that only 40 percent of Democrats upheld the death penalty a year ago, down from 71 percent in 1996.
That same survey demonstrated GOP support for the arrangement dropping 10 focuses, from 87 to 77 percent, throughout the decade. Times are changing for preservationists — however for particularly traditionalist reasons. In the previous year, Republican legislators in red-inclining Nebraska, Utah, Missouri, Kentucky, Kansas, Ohio, Wyoming, Montana, South Dakota and New Hampshire have all supported bills to rescind capital punishment. They're sorting out themselves in spots like North Caro
Coash understood that the customary contentions against capital punishment — the potential for blunder; the way it is unevenly connected to poor, dark and rationally crippled respondents — were not taking a shot at traditionalists. Those contentions, he figured, were excessively dynamic for capital punishment supporters, who looked to death line prisoners and saw men who they felt didn't merit their sensitivity. So he custom-made his methodology. "I began to outline capital punishment in an unexpected way, to change the story," he says. "I utilized Republican standards to contend this was a broken framework."
To start with, he put forth the defense that capital punishment was unreasonable and incapable. Nebraska had spent an expected $100 million on capital punishment cases and executed just three individuals since the Supreme Court's 1976 decision that insisted the legality of the death penalty. Second, Coash contended, traditionalists should be the ones who push back against out of line overextend into people's lives, and what might be a superior case of that interruption than possibly taking a pure life through the death penalty? Third, he said, the groups of casualties — huge numbers of whom had affirmed before his board of trustees that the perpetual advances on capital punishment cases were damaging and unreasonable — merited better. At the point when requested that portray his position in individual terms, he said it was reliable with a guarantee he made to dependably vote genius life.
The level headed discussion on the bill was long and enthusiastic. In any case, in May 2015, Nebraska's lawmaking body voted to cancel capital punishment, turning into the nineteenth state to boycott it and the seventh since 2007. After a week, officials wrangled enough votes to upset Gov. Pete Ricketts' veto. The representative has emptied his impressive money related assets into a November ticket measure to restore it, however the endeavors of Coash and his partners have transformed Nebraska into a test lab for restricting capital punishment from the privilege.
Religiously dedicated traditionalist activists have gotten various supports in the course of recent decades, including Pope John Paul II's assertion of Catholic resistance to capital punishment in 1995. (Pope Francis has been pretty much as insistent.) The previous quite a long while have likewise seen what Dunham calls the "guiltlessness upset" — more detainees being excused, once in a while through new examinations, different times through DNA proof — which has attracted regard for the potential for blunder. Dunham thinks the resurgence of extremist gatherings concentrated on constrained government in the wake of the retreat reignited the exchange about the expensiveness of the strategy. More youthful voters, as well, are somewhat less inclined to bolster the death penalty than more seasoned preservationists.
A year ago, the National Latino Evangelical Coalition voted collectively to restrict capital punishment. In October, the National Association of Evangelicals overhauled its 1973 determination in backing of the strategy to recognize the restriction of some of its individuals.
To achieve star capital punishment Republican voters, against capital punishment traditionalists are swinging to individuals who can talk in ways moderates may relate to, regardless of the possibility that these supporters aren't, themselves, preservationist —, for example, Christy Sheppard, a guide from Ada, Okla., whose cousin, Debra Carter, was killed in 1982. A couple of months back, Sheppard went to Nebraska to recount the tale of what happened after her cousin's passing. Five years after the killing, police captured two men, Ron Williamson and Dennis Fritz, and accused them of homicide. Fritz got life in jail; Williamson was sentenced to death. For a considerable length of time the family was fulfilled, even content with the result — until DNA testing 11 years after the fact demonstrated that both men were honest. The man inevitably discovered blameworthy in Carter's demise, Glen Gore, was at that point in jail on different charges when a DNA test distinguished him. He left a work team in the wake of discovering that he was a suspect in the 1982 murder yet turned himself in a week later. He was indicted in 2006. .
Sheppard felt colossal blame over the experience that Williamson, who experiences bipolar confusion, confronted. "To believe that we needed him to kick the bucket for a wrongdoing he wasn't even liable of — he didn't know her — is simply appalling," she says. At the point when hostile to capital punishment bunches started requesting that her recount to her story, she says, "I sensed that I couldn't not say anything."
Yet, hostile to capital punishment moderates are as yet conflicting with wide backing for the death penalty, particularly among their kindred preservationists. Kentucky's bill fizzled by one vote to make it out of the House Judiciary Committee. In Utah, the Senate passed a bill, however it was pulled from the House floor after pioneers understood that it didn't have enough votes. Furthermore, in Nebraska, Ricketts and his very rich person father, TD Ameritrade organizer Joe Ricketts, have contributed a huge number of dollars sponsorship November's tally activity to bring capital punishment back. The gathering sorting out those endeavors, Nebraskans for the Death Penalty, said in a news discharge a year ago that, as per its surveying data, 64 percent of Nebraska voters concurred with its position.
The string going through Nebraska, Kentucky, North Carolina and different states where traditionalists have been conflicting with the death penalty is Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty, a gathering established by Heather Beaudoin, a 31-year-old from Michigan with a foundation in preservationist legislative issues.
Beaudoin was brought up in a fervent family. She gets a kick out of the chance to say that her resistance to capital punishment is "of the Lord," since it's something she's felt energetic about since she was a young lady. After a brief spell in Washington, D.C., after school, Beaudoin moved to Montana to work for AmeriCorps, and one day, outside her office, the Montana Abolition Coalition held a rally with exonerees and their relatives. Beaudoin found an occupation with the coalition by proposing that she lead effort to evangelicals and the law requirement group. Following a couple of years, she went to Equal Justice USA, a gathering that takes a shot at criminal equity change issues, to dispatch a national association went for preservationists. That transformed into Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty.
Beaudoin contacts fervent and other religious pioneers and makes them discuss arrangement; her partner Marc Hyden, the gathering's national support facilitator, works with development preservationists, school Republicans, tea party activists and libertarians.
"For me, it's about recovery," Beaudoin says. "I believe that is valid for most evangelicals also. That is at the focal point of our confidence. We put stock in effortlessness, http://www.zeldainformer.com/member/31496 we trust that God can do magnificent things. By what means would we be able to say, 'You are the most noticeably awful of the most exceedingly bad, you are not commendable, and we will discard you?' What does that say in regards to us and what we accept?"
Hyden says he and Beaudoin have been astounded by how they've been invited at occasions like the Conservative Political Action Conference and on preservationist school grounds. "I'm finding that we are being acknowledged in probably the most traditionalist circles of America," he says.
Hyden, who already worked for the National Rifle Association, outlines his contentions to development moderates in a somewhat diverse manner than Beaudoin does. "There's nothing constrained about offering energy to the state to murder you," he says. Particularly "in the event that you don't believe the administration to dispatch a social insurance site or convey mail."
In any case, he comprehends and also anybody that the excursion to restricting capital punishment is a long and troublesome one. "I used to bolster it, I'm somewhat embarrassed to say," Hyden says. "I was willing to abuse my own particular moderate standards." The harder he took a gander at the issues, however, "the less I could legitimize supporting it. It dangers blameless lives, it is extremely unlikely it's genius life and it costs more than existence without the chance for further appeal."
That sort of thoughtfulness, Coash and his associates say, is precisely what their side needs.
Amid the level headed discussion over capital punishment in Nebraska, Coash said, his dad in-law, a rancher, was stunned and asked him, "What the heck are you doing?" Coash laid out his case, arrival on the way that the state hadn't completed an execution in 20 years. Coash says his dad in-law reacted: "Well, shoot, dispose of it then!" He realizes that the expert capital punishment development is imposing, yet he stays cheerful.
Aaron David Miller is a VP at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington. He served in the State Department from 1978 to 2003.
Israel needed no part in it. Furthermore, neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians were booked to go to. However Secretary of State John Kerry stayed hopeful in front of Friday's certain to-go-no place Middle East peace gathering in Paris. "What we are looking to do," he said, "is urge the gatherings to have the capacity to see a path forward so they comprehend peace is a probability."
I perceive that assessment: needing to stay playful, even while realizing that the chances are long. For a lot of my 24-year vocation as a State Department Middle East expert, mediator and guide, I held out trust that a contention finishing peace assention was conceivable. I had confidence in transactions as a talking cure and thought the United States could orchestrate an extensive arrangement. I put stock in the force of U.S. discretion.
Be that as it may, when I cleared out government in 2003, I was a baffled ambassador and peace processor with genuine questions about what the United States could perform in the Middle East. I understand now that, as Kerry, I was tilting at windmills. U.S.- handled peace in the Middle East is an eccentric journey. Also, the more we attempt and come up short, the less believability and influence we have in the area.
Thinking back now, the high purpose of my good faith was presumably in 1991, the year we coordinated another, more beneficial Middle East peace meeting in Madrid. I recall that on one of nine outings that prompted the meeting, a substantial fly loaded onto the plane with us at Andrews Air Force Base and hummed annoyingly around the staff compartment. I was vainly attempting to swat it when Secretary of State James Baker strolled by to brief the press in the back of the air ship. Hours after the fact, while drafting arguments, I felt a nearness behind me and turned generally as Baker's huge hand dropped the fly onto my yellow legitimate cushion.
That sort of entireties up how I pondered our tact in those days: With great planning and decisive American administration (something shy of fly-squashing animal power), we could take care of rotting issues for the last time. My reminders at the time had a yes-we-can edge.
The minute appeared to be ready for a Middle East leap forward encouraged by the United States. Our impact in the area was at an unequaled high. The U.S. military had quite recently pushed Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait, and the Israelis and Arabs were reeling — on account of Jordan, Syria and the Palestinians, they were searching for approaches to charm themselves into America's great graces. We were regarded, appreciated and dreaded in the district to a degree we haven't been subsequent to.
Bread cook, in the interim, was most likely the best U.S. arbitrator to handle the Middle East since Henry Kissinger facilitated three separation understandings in the wake of the 1973 Arab-Israeli War. I watched Baker wheedle, weight and undermine to leave both Israel's Yitzhak Shamir and Syria's Hafez al-Assad, and I saw him cluster with Palestinians like a football mentor to urge them to go to the peace gathering. It helped that he had the full sponsorship of President George H.W. Shrubbery — his dear companion who thought about Mideast peace and was following through on a promise to Saudi Arabia that he'd interpretation of the Arab-Israeli issue after the Persian Gulf War.
The Madrid meeting created the principal direct reciprocal transactions and peace process accomplishment amongst Israelis and Arabs — Syrians, Jordanians and Palestinians — since the Egyptian-Israeli understanding 12 years prior. I delighted in our accomplishment and wondered about what U.S. discretion could achieve when it was intense, diligent and key.
My slip-up was in trusting that Madrid, which truly delivered just a procedural achievement, would fundamentally make an establishment for advancement on the substantive issues. I thought on the off chance that we simply kept the procedure going, on the off chance that we were submitted and inventive, we would by one means or another discover our approach to understanding between the Israelis and the Palestinians on Jerusalem, fringes and displaced people, alongside assention between the Israelis and the Syrians on the Golan Heights. Be that as it may, we never arrived. Process can't substitute for substance.
I kept up my lost positive thinking into the Clinton organization. Sitting with my family on the South Lawn of the White House in September 1993, watching President Bill Clinton manage the noteworthy handshake between Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization Chairman Yasser Arafat, I accepted, in what must be a standout amongst the most dazzling misconceptions of my vocation, that the peace procedure had ended up irreversible.
The Israelis and the Palestinians, without U.S. inclusion, had achieved a concession to common acknowledgment and an announcement of rule that should get them toward chats on the huge issues. I truly thought they had taken responsibility for transactions and would devote themselves to making the Oslo Accords stick.
Through the emergencies of the following seven years of the Oslo procedure — Palestinian terrorist assaults, Israeli settlement action, the death of Rabin by an Israeli radical restricted to Oslo — I kept the confidence that the all-powerful peace prepare eventually would succeed. I persuaded https://www.behance.net/arftier2087d myself that with included desperation from the United States, the certainty building, between time allots laid in the Oslo assention could be made to work and make ready for arrangements on the center issues. Right on time in 1997, truly down staring me in the face and knees in the West Bank city of Hebron measuring the width of a road that figured unmistakably in the arrangements, I felt both little and praised. This was imperative, and I'd do anything to keep the procedure alive.
My dedication, and the illusions that managed it, would take me the distance to the less than ideal, not well coordinated and badly arranged July 2000 Camp David summit: a final desperate attempt to spare the Oslo procedure. Amid an instructions a week prior to, Clinton circumvented the room soliciting everybody to gage the prospects from the summit. What's more, everybody, from the national security consultant to the secretary of state, said pretty much the same thing: There was a chance; Ehud Barak and Arafat would settle on choices just in the warmth of a summit; the president owed it to the cause and to himself to seek after peace before the end of his term. The appraisal we as a whole ought to have given him was that there would be no contention finishing accord or even a structure assention, in light of the fact that neither Barak nor Arafat were prepared to pay the cost, and the president was unrealistic to connect the holes. However, I neglected my questions and reverberated the others. Some portion of me was worried about annoying others in the room. The solicitations to Arafat and Barak had as of now been issued, so the instructions truly was a convention. Be that as it may, some portion of despite everything me needed to trust that we could make peace.
The president believed that on the off chance that he could simply get the Israelis and the Palestinians in the room, he could by one means or another get them to an assention, expanding on what Barak was set up to offer and utilizing the celebrated Clinton forces of influence. Be that as it may, we had no methodology, we facilitated too intimately with the Israelis, and we had no Arab purchase in on issues, for example, Jerusalem nor any sign that the Palestinians would get off their center requests. We didn't run the summit; the summit ran us.
When I recall about that game changing period, I shiver. With the best of aims, in eight months, we arranged three presidential transactions (two on the Syrian track and one on the Palestinian) and fizzled at all three.
What I ought to have understood from the beginning was that solid U.S. intervention can't compensate for frail authority of the gatherings to a transaction. We can't talk them into getting control over their political voting public. What's more, we can't expect that our energy will induce them to put resources into arrangements, go for broke or perceive that an arranged settlement is to their greatest advantage (and not only our own).
In March 2002, amid the tallness of the second intifada, President George W. Bramble's Middle East agent, Anthony Zinni, and I were sent to arrange a truce amongst Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. In any case, that was either the Bush organization's concept of a brutal joke or only a disposable idea before the last break with the PLO pioneer.
That week, a Palestinian suicide aircraft had exploded himself at a Passover seder in Netanya, executing 30 Israelis and injuring 140. Israeli strengths reacted with Operation Defensive Shield, entering the West Bank and forcing terminations on most real Palestinian urban communities and towns.
I'll always remember the scene in Arafat's compound. The spot smelled of foul air, stench and excessively few working toilets. The main light, in what had been in better days a sensibly sufficiently bright meeting room, originated from candles and a touch of sun that figured out how to look through windows that were totally passed out inspired by a paranoid fear of Israeli marksmen. Also, there in the anguish sat a vain Arafat, his dark automatic weapon forebodingly showed on the table, holding forward about how he'd be preferably be martyred than surrender to Israel's diktats.
There was no more any opportunity for me to support the significance of procedure without bearing, arrangements without substance or even the utilization of "peace." Our overinflated good faith at Camp David had genuine expenses. In the wake of raising desires we couldn't convey on, we censured Arafat for the summit's disappointment, and that made it less demanding for him, in the wake of Sharon's provocative visit to the hallowed Temple Mount, to submit to and support the viciousness that would turn into the second intifada.
U.S. discretion can be powerful when we have accomplices willing to decide, when all gatherings feel a desperation to settle on those choices and when holes isolating the gatherings can really be connected. The Iran atomic understanding, while g
Be that as it may, with regards to matters that slice to the center of individuals' characters —, for example, Jerusalem or Palestinian exiles, or the social building http://www.oag.jp/member/527933/ required to end Syria's affable war — or making a result in Iraq or Libya that produces soundness and great administration, the United States doesn't have the steeds to pull the wagon. The badly designed the truth is that we will never have a more noteworthy stake in this locale, or more energy to cure its ills, than the individuals who live there.
I haven't surrendered trust in savvy and all around coordinated U.S. tact. Be that as it may, I've surrendered my illusions of exactly the amount America is capable and willing to do to repair a seriously broken, savage and unforgiving Middle East.
As the fix-it individuals, Americans experience considerable difficulties that we can't deal with clashes when those straightforwardly included aren't willing or ready to do as such. In any case, now and again, it bodes well for our representatives and mediators to stay home as opposed to look powerless and incapable while scanning for answers for issues they essentially can't resolve.
No comments:
Post a Comment